While it didn’t make the cut, the Instax Square SQ1 is also worth a brief mention. Like the Mini 12, the Square SQ1 produces good-quality shots, is easy to set up and use, and features a built-in selfie mirror. The reason we didn’t include it above, however, is that it costs nearly twice as much as the Mini 12 at $159.95, though we do sometimes see it on sale for $100. That said, it might be worth a look if you prefer large 2.4 x 2.4-inch square prints and relatively true-to-life photos over vintage-looking stills. After all, the SQ1 is still cheaper than the Polaroid Flip and produces higher-quality images than the Kodak Mini Shot 3 Square Retro, which also prints similarly sized square shots.
https://feedx.site
，更多细节参见51吃瓜
Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Strands.
Although these tins are now closer to their market prices on TCGplayer, actual listings on the trading card selling platform cost so much that Amazon and Walmart listings represent better value for money.
。搜狗输入法2026是该领域的重要参考
47 pairs have negative mean SSIM: the source and target are anti-correlated, sharing less structure than random noise. The worst offenders:，这一点在同城约会中也有详细论述
FT Edit: Access on iOS and web